<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nuclear Option: What Democrats Said About Changing Senate Rules in 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floridapundit.com/2010/03/the-nuclear-option-what-democrats-said-about-changing-senate-rules-in-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floridapundit.com/2010/03/the-nuclear-option-what-democrats-said-about-changing-senate-rules-in-2005/</link>
	<description>The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts. - Edmund Burke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:48:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Ideology at Work: Do Whatever It Takes &#124; Florida Pundit</title>
		<link>http://floridapundit.com/2010/03/the-nuclear-option-what-democrats-said-about-changing-senate-rules-in-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Ideology at Work: Do Whatever It Takes &#124; Florida Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridapundit.com/?p=1954#comment-712</guid>
		<description>[...] plans to ram the bill through via reconciliation by violating the traditions of the Senate and causing what Democrats have previously described as a constitutional crisis.  He reverses his own previously stated position that you should only pass sweeping legislation by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plans to ram the bill through via reconciliation by violating the traditions of the Senate and causing what Democrats have previously described as a constitutional crisis.  He reverses his own previously stated position that you should only pass sweeping legislation by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

